B - ロッカーの整理 / Organizing the Locker Editorial by admin
Claude 4.5 OpusOverview
This problem asks us to find the number of open lockers after performing divisor-related operations on \(N\) lockers. The conclusion is that the answer is the count of perfect squares up to \(N\) (i.e., \(\lfloor\sqrt{N}\rfloor\)).
Analysis
Key Insight: How Many Times Each Locker is Toggled
Locker \(k\) is toggled during operation \(i\) when \(k\) is a multiple of \(i\), which means when \(i\) is a divisor of \(k\).
Therefore, locker \(k\) is toggled exactly as many times as the number of divisors of \(k\).
Determining the Final State
- Initially, all lockers are closed
- If toggled an odd number of times → open
- If toggled an even number of times → closed
This means lockers with an odd number of divisors are open.
Condition for an Odd Number of Divisors
Normally, divisors come in pairs. For example, the divisors of \(12\) pair up as \((1, 12), (2, 6), (3, 4)\), so the number of divisors is even.
However, only for perfect squares, we have \(\sqrt{k} \times \sqrt{k} = k\), and \(\sqrt{k}\) exists alone without a pair.
Example: The divisors of \(9\) are \(1, 3, 9\), and since \(3 \times 3 = 9\), \(3\) stands alone. There are \(3\) divisors (odd).
Conclusion
The locker numbers that are open among those up to \(N\) are \(1, 4, 9, 16, 25, \ldots\) — the perfect squares.
The count of perfect squares up to \(N\) is \(\lfloor\sqrt{N}\rfloor\).
Why a Naive Approach Won’t Work
Since \(N \leq 10^{18}\) is extremely large, approaches that simulate each locker with \(O(N)\) or \(O(N \log N)\) complexity are far too slow. Using the mathematical insight above, we need to solve this in \(O(1)\).
Algorithm
- Read input \(N\)
- Calculate \(\lfloor\sqrt{N}\rfloor\) (in Python, use
math.isqrt(N)) - Output the result
Complexity
- Time complexity: \(O(1)\) (only computing the square root)
- Space complexity: \(O(1)\)
Implementation Notes
Why use
math.isqrt(): Since \(N\) can be as large as \(10^{18}\), usingint(math.sqrt(N))may cause errors due to floating-point precision issues.math.isqrt()computes the integer square root exactly using integer arithmetic, making it safe for large numbers.Verification with a concrete example: For \(N = 10\)
- Locker \(1\): divisors \(\{1\}\) → \(1\) time → open
- Locker \(2\): divisors \(\{1, 2\}\) → \(2\) times → closed
- Locker \(3\): divisors \(\{1, 3\}\) → \(2\) times → closed
- Locker \(4\): divisors \(\{1, 2, 4\}\) → \(3\) times → open
- Locker \(9\): divisors \(\{1, 3, 9\}\) → \(3\) times → open
The open lockers are \(1, 4, 9\) — that’s \(3\) lockers = \(\lfloor\sqrt{10}\rfloor = 3\) ✓
Source Code
import math
N = int(input())
print(int(math.isqrt(N)))
This editorial was generated by claude4.5opus.
posted:
last update: