F - Sugoroku2 Editorial by lucifer1004
Let’s first simplify this problem to the following form:
- There is a mission, our succeeding probability is \(p_s\), and the cost is \(E_s\), while our failing probability is \(p_f=1-p_s\), and the cost is \(E_f\).
- We will stop as long as we succeed, otherwise we keep trying.
- What is the expected value of our total cost?
The expected value of the total cost can be represented as:
\[ E=E_sp_s+(E_f+E_s)p_fp_s+(2E_f+E_s)p_f^2p_s+\cdots \]
It equals to:
\[ E_sp_s+p_fp_s((E_f+E_s)+(2E_f+E_s)p_f+\cdots) \]
We need to calculate two sums:
\[ \sum_s=E_s+E_sp_f+E_sp_f^2+\cdots=E_s\frac{1}{1-p_f}=\frac{E_s}{p_s} \]
and
\[ \sum_f=E_f+2E_fp_f+3E_fp_f^2+\cdots \]
which is a bit harder.
Actually, we have:
\[ \sum_fp_f=E_fp_f+2E_fp_f^2+\cdots \]
So we have:
\[ (1-p_f)\sum_f=E_f(1+p_f+p_f^2+\cdots)=E_f\frac{1}{1-p_f}=\frac{E_f}{p_s} \]
So
\[ \sum_f=\frac{E_f}{p_s^2} \]
Then we return to the original equation and now we have:
\[ E=E_sp_s+p_fp_s(\sum_f+\sum_s)=E_sp_s+p_fp_s(\frac{E_s}{p_s}+\frac{E_f}{p_s^2})=E_sp_s+(1-p_s)(E_s+\frac{E_f}{p_s}) \]
Now we return to the original problem and try to calculate \(E_s\), \(E_f\) and \(p_s\).
Here, if we arrive at the \(N\)-th position, we succeed. If we are sent back to the \(0\)-th position, we fail.
The idea is similar to LC837 - New 21 Game. We store the sum of the probability of the positions which can come to the current position, then
\[ p_i=\frac{\sum_p}{M} \]
Of course, the broken positions will not contribute to \(\sum_p\). Also, we need to add \(p_i\) (if \(i\) is not broken) and remove \(p_{i-M}\) (if \(i-M\) is not broken) when \(i\geq M\).
But here we also need the expected value \(E_i\), which can be represented as:
\[ E_i=\frac{\sum p_j(E_j+1)}{\sum_p}=1+\frac{\sum p_jE_j}{\sum_p} \]
The expression indicates that instead of calculating \(E_i\), we can calculate \(p_iE_i\) instead:
\[ p_iE_i=\frac{\sum_p}{M}+\frac{\sum p_jE_j}{M} \]
In a similar manner, we can calculate \(p_iE_i\) accumulatively. Note that the broken positions’ \(pE\) contributes to \(p_fE_f\) instead of \(\sum_{pE}\).
Since surpassing the \(N\)-th position is also counted as reaching the \(N\)-th position, our enumeration will stop at the \(N-1\)-th position. For each position that can reach the \(N\)-th position, we will calculate its contribution to \(p_N\) and \(p_NE_N\) according to the proportion \(\frac{i+M-N+1}{M}\).
Finally, we can get \(p_fE_f\), \(p_s=p_N\) and \(p_sE_s=p_NE_N\), and with these values, we can calculate the final answer \(E\).
- Time complexity is \(\mathcal{O}(N)\).
- Space complexity is \(\mathcal{O}(N)\).
Source code:
use proconio::input;
fn main() {
input! {
n: usize,
m: usize,
k: usize,
a: [usize; k],
}
let mut broken = vec![false; n + 1];
for i in a {
broken[i] = true;
}
let mut prob_exp = vec![0.0; n + 1];
let mut prob = vec![0.0; n + 1];
prob[0] = 1.0;
let mut prob_sum: f64 = 1.0;
let mut exp_sum: f64 = 0.0;
if m >= n {
let goal_pct = (m - n + 1) as f64 / m as f64;
prob[n] += prob[0] * goal_pct;
prob_exp[n] += (prob_exp[0] + prob[0]) * goal_pct;
}
let mut prob_exp_fail = 0.0;
for i in 1..n {
prob[i] = prob_sum / m as f64;
prob_exp[i] = prob[i] + exp_sum / m as f64;
if !broken[i] {
prob_sum += prob[i];
exp_sum += prob_exp[i];
if i + m >= n {
let goal_pct = (i + m - n + 1) as f64 / m as f64;
prob[n] += prob[i] * goal_pct;
prob_exp[n] += (prob_exp[i] + prob[i]) * goal_pct;
}
} else {
prob_exp_fail += prob_exp[i];
}
if i >= m && !broken[i - m] {
prob_sum -= prob[i - m];
exp_sum -= prob_exp[i - m];
}
}
if prob[n] < 1e-8 {
println!("-1");
} else if (prob[n] - 1.0).abs() < 1e-8 {
println!("{}", prob_exp[n]);
} else {
let exp_fail = prob_exp_fail / (1.0 - prob[n]);
println!("{}", prob_exp[n] + (1.0 - prob[n]) * (prob_exp[n] + exp_fail) / prob[n]);
}
}
posted:
last update: